Healthy Environment, Healthy Children
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Important Resources
  • Issues
    • Seriously in what universe are we?
    • Yelling
    • On the Importance of Fathers
    • The Pandemic and safety of schools
    • Loss, development, and children
  • Opinions
    • New Page
    • The Fallacy of the Mini Approach to Parenting.
    • Mottos and men
    • Children are not Responsible for Social Change
    • Reawakening of a Teacher
    • Firearms and Children
    • Firearms and children: revisited 2022
    • Jimmy Carter's Call to Action
    • What's in a name?
    • When Bullying Happens to the Strongest
  • Bullying Ends Today: The Bullies
    • Disengaged Onlookers
    • Bully Supporters and Followers
    • Defenders and Possible Defenders
    • Bystanders
    • The Role of Parents
    • Power, Control & Bullying
    • I deserved it
    • Bullying and the Hierarchy of Needs
    • The end of bullying and the 6 Core Strengths
  • Bully/Victim Questionnaire
    • Frequency of Bullying
    • Personal Stories of Bullying

Bully Prevention throughout childhood

10/4/2013

0 Comments

 
The past few years we have seen a consistent number of young teens,
especially girls, committing suicide after suffering consistent bullying from
peers. Sometimes it comes as a result of behavior on the teen’s part, but this
essay is not about victim-blaming. It is, however, some suggestions based on the
work of Erik Erikson and his ideas on human development that might help young
people get through the juggernaut that is middle and high school social life.



Erikson and psychosocial development


Erik Erikson believed in the influence of one’s surrounding on their human development. He believed that we resolve crises based on how we pass
through those stages of development. I have a pretty solid, albeit not comprehensive, knowledge of Erikson’s perspective and surmise that we did not pass through them once and then forever and always our crisis in this area of
  development is over; rather, we continue to move through them and resolve them throughout our lifetime.


Trust versus Mistrust


Erikson believed that as infants we look to our caregivers for support
and for meeting our needs. Those needs can be emotional or even more basically, food, trauma, basic help and so forth. The individual develops a sense of trust that a caregiver will come to their aid. For the teen, it is the basis for
trusting those around them to meet their needs. Parents must ensure that they
have established a strong foundation for being there unconditionally for their
children early so when it comes time to share their most vulnerable events –
when they are being picked on – they feel they can come and talk to their
caregiver.


Autonomy versus Self-Doubt


This stage begins at about 2/3 years of age. There is a reason why some
children become ornery at this age. Imagine having all these wants and ideas and opinions but caregivers aren’t always prepared to fulfill those wants and needs and certainly cannot entertain all the opinions of a three year old. However, giving selections from which the child can choose will instill the idea that they can make their own decisions and think about their choices. 
If their choices are always made for them or they are consistently
corrected for their choices, a sense of self-doubt develops and, later on in
their childhood, the teen will doubt themselves, their judgment and their
choices – and possibly look to others to make choices for them. The child who is
allowed to make choices herself and can count on the caregiver to be there,
without judgment, to support her through the bumps and bruises of bad choices
will develop a sense of strength and not be easily led astray. 



Initiative versus guilt


At 3-5 years of age, after successfully resolving the autonomy crisis,
the child takes the initiative and makes decisions on his own. The caregiver can
reinforce this behavior by providing instances where choice can be made and then acknowledging and valuing the decision made by the child. However, if the child is made to feel bad about making decisions on his own, a sense of guilt and
doubt can result. For the teen, this stage sets the foundation for being given
opportunities to make decisions and then having those decisions respected and
rewarded with acknowledgement and praise. They won’t always make the right
decisions but that is why we have established a sense of trust in the child
early so that guidance and re-direction aren’t seen as criticism but rather,
wisdom out of a place of love and support. Having initiative might ensure that
the teen will make their own decisions and not be led by others into negative
behavior. It also means that the teen will not be made to feel guilty over
decisions, good or bad, that they have made because they are the ones who made them and will stand behind them. This stance also instills in the teen that the decisions they make will be decisions for which they will be held accountable. 
 
Industry versus inferiority


Some students who have been in psychology courses with me have
identified this stage as the most important in developing a healthy adult. I am
on the undecided – I think they are all equally important – but I appreciate
their logic. If you feel like you have the support of a caregiver and they
create an environment where you can make decisions on your own and those
decisions are honored and valued, then you are more likely to make decisions on
your own and feel confident in them. Whether it is being pressured into sex or
teased relentlessly, the child who feels supported, makes decisions on their own
using common sense and stands behind those decisions and actually makes
decisions that might not be popular because they feel strong in their choice, is
more likely to withstand bullying – even cyber bullying for which there seems to
be no safe place to hide. The child who is made to feel bad about the choices
they have made, including statements like – “see, I told you so. Just do what I
say and it will be fine”- will feel inferior and not make their own decisions
and certainly will not stand behind the decisions they make.



Identity versus Role Confusion


Here is the crucial time for teens. At this stage in Erikson’s model,
the individual develops a sense of who they are, or they resolve the crisis
negatively and do not establish the kind of person they are going to be and may
flounder for a while. But that is the crux of the decision. Those who flounder
may very well be led astray because they have no sense of who they are and what they believe in so they may not base their decisions on a sense of integrity to their character but more so to the character for which they are receiving
attention.



What this means for the teens who are being bullied or, especially,
young ladies who are bullied and feel there is no way out is this: we have to
instill in them from a very early age that they can come to us for anything and
we will listen without judgment and not undervalue their perspective. I have
personally heard parents say that their teen is “so dramatic.” That may very
well be true but that is the level at which they are thinking. This belief has
been referred to as the adolescent fairy tale and adolescent egocentrism when
they cannot understand why their caregivers cannot see how important and life
changing an issue is to them. I recall a scene in, The Breakfast Club, when the
group is in a circle and Allison (the head case) tells the group that, “it’s
inevitable. When we grow up, our hearts die.”


Bu we also need to teach our children to take criticism and harassment
with a grain of salt. I have an adage that some might argue isn’t worth even a
grain of salt but I believe it is true. There is a reason why I don’t get upset
if someone bets me to the basket when playing basketball, or steps on my shoes
on the Max or even says bad things about me or “my mom.” Because I don’t need your respect – I bring my own. The reason my students do what is expected isn’t their respect for me personally, it is because they will not pass the class if they do not do the things that the University and the state of Oregon have
decided they need to do to demonstrate their proficiency. And I don’t treat them
with respect because they have “earned it” – it is because I understand for my
students to do well I need to create a plan, teach to that plan and then assess
fairly to determine if they have retained enough to meet the aforementioned
state and university standards. I play a small but important role in
facilitating that progress but I don’t need my students to “respect” me.



Having said that, I hope my son won’t be misguided by “friends” or
harangued to the point of giving up because he longs for their respect. He has
his own and he will have strength of character and pride in himself and his
family that will surpass any hurtful names or pernicious gossip that may be
headed his way.  When I was I high school, there was a rumor I was gay because the clothes I wore were hand-me-downs and sometimes quite tight. 
If I didn’t have a family who loved me, a small circle of real friends
  and pride in myself – it may have hurt me greatly. This was early 80’s and we
  didn’t have LGBT communities and pride groups on campuses – if you were gay, good luck.


If he is maligned for whatever life choices he makes, he will have the
strength of character and support of his parents to stand behind his decisions.
That seems to be a common thread among several of the young ladies who have made bad choices and then were shamed or embarrassed by their school chums’ response. Liam won’t be. He will own his decision and stand behind it. But he won’t stand alone. I wonder how many of the young ladies especially didn’t go to their families because they didn’t think they could. 
 

I don’t have all the answers; not even sure the answers I have are the
right ones. But I know that the tragedy that unfolds day after day needs lots of
voices to chime in so that we can have a discussion and solve the problem as
best we can.


 
0 Comments

Oregon is doing it right

2/3/2012

1 Comment

 
http://www.childrensdefense.org/child-research-data-publications/data/state-data-repository/children-in-the-states.html

The Children's Defense Fund, honorably headed by Marian Wright Edelman, has released the State of Children in the States data factbook (see the above website). It gathers statistics from various sites to inform people how their state is doing in terms of relieving those living in poverty, but mostly children and their condition in the United States. Of course, I am concerned with the states of Washington and California since I have family in both - but it is Oregon and my own son that interests me the most. The news is encouraging and today's article will present some data and my response.

Out of 50 states, Oregon ranks 3rd in newborns "low birthweight." Translated, that means that 47 other states have higher rates of low birthweight. Low birthweight has been associated with learning difficulties, lower immune systems and other associated correlations like limited prenatal care, poverty and future health concerns. Evidently, Oregonian expectant mothers take care of themselves and the stars align well for them.

Oregon ranks 6th in infant mortality; 44 other states have higher infant mortality rates - which means that Oregon's newborns stay alive. We had our son in Washington so I hesitate to speak to the quality of the birthing practices in Oregon but if it is anywhere near the care, sensitivity and professionalism of the birth process we went through - I am not surprised Oregon ranks high in preventing infant mortality.

Child Hunger is another category I want to point to when I speak of the proactive, positive stance by the Oregon legislature and its officials. Of the applicants who receive assistance via food stamps, 92 % of the possible recipients receive the assistance (SNAP). Pretty impressive statistic when you think there is a minute amount of fraudulent claims and claims that are made for college students and single individuals.

In 2010 there were 535,000 children in Oregon public schools. Consider there were slight fluctuations in the 2011 number and the percentage of children receiving free and reduced lunch (which is an indicator of poverty since the qualification includes being below the federal poverty line - that's somwhere below $15,000 a year for a family of three), is 52%. The actual 2011 number is 328,000 children are served by the federal free and reduced lunch program. While this is a sign of the times, I have visited schools and talked with principals who provide free breakfast and lunch simply because the percentage of children who qualify for the program is so high. I believe there is actually a policy in place for Portland Public schools that allows schools to provide free and reduced breakfast and lunch for all children if the total percentage of kids who qualify exceeds 65%.

At any rate, Oregon cares for its children more than most other states as illustrated by its proactive stance and positive practices - in my experience, they err on the side of human and that is a good message to send to your citizens.
1 Comment

Im getting testy about testing!

6/27/2009

0 Comments

 

    Not an especially captivating title but I have reached the point of having to respond to the notion that standardized, federally-mandated testing to measure students' progress is an effective and meaningful policy; to butcher Mike Myers' skit, standardized testing is neither effective nor meaningful - discuss.

 

    It is time that the field of education and those related to it come to the conclusion that assessment should be left to the classroom teacher as a tool for creating meaningful, engaging, challenging curriculum based on the progress made by their students. Even though I agree with the idea that assessment should be used as a means to communicate progress to parents and other stakeholders - that should never come before the best interests of students. Standardized tests (CAT - 5, WASL, and the like) are not effective because they only take into consideration topics and question types that fit a certain type of student; thus the moniker, standardized. If it could measure all the different types of knowledge, ways of expressing that knowledge and importance of the knowledge children have - it wouldnt be a standard because one does not, and, in all practicality, CAN NOT, exist. Alfie Kohn wrote a book entitled, What does it mean to be well educated? This is just one of his wonderful books and I recommend it. The question is clear - how can knowledge be standardized and who sets the standard? Common sense will tell you that different kinds of knowledge are important depending upon where and how one lives. Pragmatically speaking, a standard cannot be set. But, for the sake of argument, let us accept that a standard has been set. How can the material be meaningful or meaningfully presented?

 

    Creating a standardized assessment that is meaningful can provide a challenge for even the best teacher because a good teacher knows what is meaningful to one student may not be meaningful to another so how does it become a standard? So the idea of creating a meaningful standardized test is virtually impossible, but creating a meaningful assessment to determine student strengths, weakenesses and progress is not impossible.

 

    I taught the primary level assessment course at a small university for about five years and I always emphasized that assessment should be meaningful, ongoing, continuous and developmentally appropriate. Since it was the primary level I did model authentic assessment strategies such as anecdotal records, observations, performance assessments, interviews and other collaborative types of assessment. But in discussions with my students after they moved on to the upper elementary assessment class, I reiterated those same ideas about assessment at that level. The only advantage to the classroom teacher that federal, "fill-in-the-bubble" tests provide is one of expediency. But, the NEED for expediency is artificially imposed by each level of administration.

 

    Over the past two months (probably because the school assessment reports showing progress or lack thereof have come in), I have seen news byte after news byte showing teachers, principals, assistant principals, parents who work as school secretaries changing grades or test scores. I suggest that they do that in order to save face in the light of scrutiny. Schools that are underperforming as judged by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) feel a great deal of pressure to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) or be reconstituted as per the NCLB Act. But so many of theses schools have children that face so many more challenges than just learning grammar, math and science. They come to school hungry, dirty, ignored, underserviced and exposed to a variety of violent influences. How can we blame teachers for children failing tests that are ineffective in measuring what these children actually know and meaningless to children whose lives are filled with far worse influences than many children in other areas know.

 

    The State (of Oregon for example) already has standards and expectations for students to meet, my suggestion is to let teachers meet those standards in collaboration with children and parents, using engaging curriculum and measured by the teacher, not for a standardized score, but for progress in each student's understanding of the topic.


0 Comments

    Author

    My passion in life is raising awareness of the factors contributing to the toxic environment in which children live.

    Archives

    October 2013
    April 2012
    February 2012
    February 2011
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009

    Categories

    All
    Assessment
    Bandura
    Behaviorism
    Bullies
    Bully
    Bullying
    Chicago
    Children
    Childrens Defense Fund
    Civil
    Collaboration
    Cooperation And Competition
    Dap
    Dissociation
    Dr. King
    Duncan
    Education
    Effects
    Equity
    Erikson
    Gates Education
    Grade Levels
    Grades
    High School
    Hitting
    Hope
    King
    Law
    Luther
    Martin
    Mike
    National Academic Standards
    Obama
    Oregon
    Parents
    Play
    Poverty
    Psychosocial Development
    Race To The Top
    Reading
    Resiliency
    Respect
    Role Model
    Snap
    Social
    Social Learning Theory
    Spanking
    Standards
    Tacoma
    Tanf
    Target
    Teacher Merit Pay
    Teachers
    Testing
    Therapy
    Tyson

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.